How to Win an Argument Every Time (According to Science)

Posted on 25th Jul, 2017 by Barbara Davidson

Winning an argument isn’t easy. Even if you have the best points, it can be difficult to get the edge if you lack experience debating. The human personality is a complex thing, and to win an argument means not just knowing your case but how to put it across.

We all know somebody who likes to make things difficult. From topics in the news to important stuff at work, they stubbornly refuse to listen. Sometimes it’s okay to let it pass, but winning an argument from time to time is good for your confidence and for the flow of knowledge. If only you could make them see things your way!

The art of winning an argument is an ancient one – and today it’s backed up by scientific research. For example, we know that simply asking an opponent to explain their logic can make it fall right apart.

It also has a lot to do with your own physiology. Look at the power of posture: standing up straight can give you confidence, while a more aggressive stance can make your opponent defensive and resistant to your point of view. Take a deep breath before you start arguing and concentrate not just on your words but how you say them.

Our new infographic provides a thorough guide to winning an argument, whatever the scenario. You can give your superior knowledge the back-up it deserves with these simple tips.

The important outcome is a sense of progress and not always winning an argument. But for those occasions when victory means everything, it is helpful to have some serious debating skills!

Vecchi, G.M. et al. (2005). Crisis (hostage) negotiation: current strategies and issues in high-risk conflict resolution. Aggression and Violent Behavior.
Tanner, R.J. et al (2007). Of Chameleons and Consumption: The Impact of Mimicry on Choice and Preferences. Journal of Consumer Research.
Chen, F.S. et al (2013). In the Eye of the Beholder: Eye Contact Increases Resistance to Persuasion. Psychological Science.
Fernbach, P. et al (2013). Political Extremism Is Supported by an Illusion of Understanding. Psychological Science.
Rozenblitz, L and Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science 26 (2002) 521–562
Tal, A. and Wansink, B. (2014). Blinded with science: Trivial graphs and formulas increase ad persuasiveness and belief in product efficacy. Public Understanding of Science.
Cialdini, R.B. (2001). Harnessing the Science of Persuasion. Harvard Business Review
Tan, C. et al (2016). Winning Arguments: Interaction Dynamics and Persuasion. Strategies in Good-faith Online Discussions. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web
Pease, A. and Pease, B (2015). The definitive book of body language. (page 231)
Cheng, J. et al. (2016). Listen, follow me: Dynamic vocal signals of dominance predict emergent social rank in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Hameiri et al. (2014). Paradoxical thinking as a new avenue of intervention to promote peace. PNAS.
Bullée, J.H. et al. (2015). The persuasion and security awareness experiment: reducing the success of social engineering attacks. Journal of Experimental Criminology.
Newman, R. et al. (2016). Non-Verbal Presence: How Changing Your Behaviour Can Increase Your Ratings for Persuasion, Leadership and Confidence. Psychology.
Expert – Psychology Professor at UC-Irvine: Peter Ditto.
Expert – Assistant Professor of Organizational Behavior at University of Toronto: Matthew Feinberg
Dachis, A. (2013). Use the Socratic Method to Easily Win Arguments.
The Economist (2011). The power of posture.

About Barbara Davidson

Babs is Lead Content Strategist and financial guru. She loves exploring fresh ways to save more and enjoy life on a budget! When she’s not writing, you’ll find her binge-watching musicals, reading in the (sporadic) Chicago sunshine and discovering great new places to eat. Accio, tacos!